Thursday, August 15th, 2019 09:13 am
There was a somewhat blown out of proportion article about sharing your phone number on the NY Times, so i did a search on mine. I found out a page i had up to provide contact information on LJ was public. Ugh. What other free information was less concerning - the area code is associated with a place i haven't lived for 19 years, the carrier associated with the number is no longer the carrier, at least two random other names were associated with the number as well as Christine's.

It did lead me to go look at my privacy settings at twitter. You don't need a phone number there anymore, since they've long left their SMS dependency, so i removed it there. There was a setting that indicated i was allowing myself to be found by phone number, but i didn't find any results searching for my phone number before removing it.

I can be found on Telegram with my phone number, and i keep it open to chat with two people.

Obviously, someone who paid a data aggregator will get plenty of more or less accurate information (which drove the panic of the NY Times story). The state of North Carolina makes voting history (the elections in which you voted, by what method you voted) as well as gender, race, party affiliation, and residence all public, given first and last name (and includes a "sounds like" search on those fields). That database is available via other interfaces online that have indexed it differently. It seems Ohio and Florida are similarly free with their data (http://voterlist.electproject.org/states) while other states charge fees. I didn't look at all 50, but i did find those three states to be rather curious compared to other states pricing from $2.50 to $30 (California) to thousands of dollars to tens of thousands.
Thursday, August 15th, 2019 02:38 pm (UTC)
Interesting. As well as annoying. In many countries, education and even tax data is publicly available.
Thursday, August 15th, 2019 07:26 pm (UTC)
Haven't read the NYT article, so they may have covered this, but I am annoyed at how frequently my phone number is demanded (mainly because I can't remember it! whereas the housemate has several, and which one to give ... ). It occurs to me that there has finally been some clamping down on demanding Social Security numbers as identifiers, and so the phone number is being demanded instead.

... Now that I see the article on Sfgate, the writer is assuming we all freely give our phone numbers. I'm apparently way ahead on this. Walgreen's and the San Jose State library can especially get knotted.
Edited 2019-08-15 07:40 pm (UTC)
Friday, August 16th, 2019 11:25 am (UTC)
I'm always asked for my phone number. Eventually I looked into it, and legally, a phone number is considered public information... from whatever article I read a few months ago. So I've been operating on the assumption that people have the right to know my number.
OSZAR »