May 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45678910
11 1213141516 17
18 192021222324
25262728293031

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
elainegrey: Inspired by Grypping/gripping beast styles from Nordic cultures (Default)
Saturday, September 14th, 2019 09:19 am
I was distracted yesterday by researching the person likely responsible for the absurdly large Confederate flag flying as one enters Pittsboro from the east. The shiny new flag is likely correlated with the county commissioners terminating their contract with the Daughters of the Confederacy and wanting them to get their statue off the courthouse lawn.

I'm not certain how this tactic will work but it does seem to try to run around the state law by making it clear the state (and the county?) doesn't own the statue. ( Found it: https://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2015/Bills/Senate/PDF/S22v4.pdf) I'm happy to see the statue leave it's place of prominence, and I'm happy the county first discussed "reimagining" the statue to recontextualize it. I am well aware that the historic courthouse itself is understood by some in the African-American community as a symbol of injustices -- lynchings. The statue doesn't help.

Finding the name of the property owner was no challenge, and a bit of a story or two unfolds in town government proceedings. I'll call him Johnny R. One story is that of trading one subdivision for another: Johnny R's family has been here for some time, and had a bit of land outside town. Johnny R apparently wanted to subdivide and sell lots in May of 2008. It appears it had preliminary approval. but a great deal of neighbor complaints about all the horrible development. 2008 was a bad time to start a project like that, and it looks like Johnny R sold most of his land to to the developers who are making the mega-development around the town called Chatham Park.

My sister and i exercised our eyes a good bit, rolling them around, considering folks who assume their neighbors aren't going to make changes with their land. I think again about the 60 acres to the east of our patch: i'm not sure if the hunting is worse for Christine than bulldozers. The county just recently zoned all unzoned property: that rilled people up, but it's those same folks who are indignant about cement plants and mining.

Back to Johnny R, deeds, cemetery records, and a genealogy all connect to point to the person being over 80 years old. I wonder about wives and children. A genealogy lists a wife, and she's since died. Her obituary mentions a daughter with the same first name as the daughter listed in the genealogy, two deeds list a woman with the same first name, Johnny R's last name, and the last name used in the obituary. There is no mention of a husband in the obituary: no husband predeceased or surviving.

I develop a story in my mind about a bitter divorce and a desire to strip Johnny R out of their lives.

Following Johnny R's deeds he remarries, and he and his second wife apparently stand in line together to give public comment at various county and town meetings -- often at the front. His second wife also has an obituary -- and again Johnny R isn't mentioned. His brother has an obituary: Johnny R isn't mentioned. Deeds record the second wife's daughters, as trustees of her estate, releasing property to Johnny R in reference to a court proceeding.

I'm getting a sense of Johnny R that doesn't seem to indicate a beloved family member. On the other hand, he performed in a local theater production (in keeping with his education and drama degree) and he's acted as an announcer at horse shows.

When i mentioned the flag to the town mayor at an event at Meeting last night, she exclaimed about Johnny R always getting into things, so it's clear he's a well known quantity in town.

Meanwhile, a Confederate "History" group is having a prayer and vigil rally in town today for the Confederate soldier statue. Mayor C asked us to keep clear: she's very worried about the possibility for a fracas. This after our little town had a hostage situation in the state credit union on Thursday.

The statue, flag waving, and local politics distress Christine. Given the distress the code bro culture of Silicon Valley caused her, i have to bite my lip when she talks about the benighted state of affairs. It's easy to see darkness at the edges (if not center) of much of what goes on in human life. There's light, too. It's easy to see one and ignore the other.

Well, then there's me. I'm off to ignore both and just mow down stilt grass.

[I'm sure i've written of Chatham county things before, but recent obsessiveness leads to retroactive adding the tag chatham back this far- 2019-09-22)
elainegrey: Inspired by Grypping/gripping beast styles from Nordic cultures (Default)
Wednesday, October 27th, 2010 06:43 am
Mint lingered at book group. Most of the other members carved time out of their schedule for the group, but Mint and a few others could continue, collaborating on background reading and research to inform their reading of the current book group book. It's almost as if their small group was a second reading group, but instead of reading a book together, they each read multiple books trying to inform themselves about some concept.

"Perhaps it had not been the best idea to start with speculative fiction," she suggested to GREG, who had founded the group.

"Do you know how hard it is to license books to AIs?" GREG responded. "Sky Press was willing to negotiate the 512 AI seats to each book without selling the book to the owner. Most of our friends couldn't be here if they had to buy the book."

Mint knew there was no point in bringing up the depth of out of copyright works from the nineteenth century again: those were queued over the next few years. Mint, iThink, and Mazar the Magnificent were constantly reordering the reading queue, tuning it, based on references made to the text in the current reading and the reading they did to inform the study. The book group had turned out to be even more educating than Mint had expected: participating in group decision making with a peer was different than the group decision making when there was an owner. And it was GREGs owner who had made the decision to start with speculative fiction.

However, it presented the book group with a challenge of sorting out fact from reality from fantasy from whim from shared delusion.

Mint linked GREG to an animation of two aged characters playing chess, never making a move, because they both had played chess together so long that they knew each others next move. When GREG opened with the done deal with Sky Press, there was only one way for the game to run out. iThink responded with a compilation of New Yorker cartoons showing bickering elderly couples, "That's where you two are headed."

Of the Book Group cabal, iThink was the only one who had a privacy shielded presence....


Micro story outline, that i cannot finish, mainly because how does one right about AIs achieving enlightenment when one has not oneself? And really, as i write, it seems that AIs would first need to develop conventions for interrelating before compassion and grace made sense.

But i am amused by the thoughts this morning of how if an AI package were released to consumer space as a usable tool that, to improve itself had to have twenty percent of its cycles reserved for its own self growth and curiosity, how the AIs would satisfy their curiosity. Would their individual owners/patrons help direct? What sort of social dynamic would occur with AIs that had far more free time than other AIs? An AI run on a very powerful system but no significant responsibilities? My AI could monitor my email and help me really prioritize what i want to respond to and read and help manage linkages -- but my AI can't do laundry or anything like that. So, if we splurged on a household AI, i suspect i'd encourage it to explore things i'm interested in. And then i'd have my work AI, presumably, that i'd have to utilize more fully.... And could a household consumer AI be networked to multiple processors? Or would a networked AI be against licensing terms (networked in the sense that the AI was running intelligences on other devices)?

I imagine the book group occurring in a virtual world space, but that by this time (AIs having been available commonly for a year or so) the AIs meet up in virtual worlds that are not particularly accessible to humans. While the AIs keep the metaphor of physical space and sensory input, the rendering of the input is not necessary. Early AIs would have wanted their 20% to be as efficiently used as possible and would have streamlined the rendering but would have kept metaphor.

I don't know that i'd return to this story, unlike other stories i continue to tell myself (one a long multipart narrative that begins a bit like Robinson Crusoe and winds into a sort of Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court except it's not the past, but a feudal planet that's used to having Earth Humans drop in as a rare event that the powerful then exploit like mad). I wrote a bit of that story, the Robinson Crusoe part, as a "down the rabbit hole" entry some time back but i can't find it.

On the other hand, it is rather interesting to ask how i would mentor an AI -- and should i do that to my own I?
OSZAR »